Page 1 of 5

Is this really what the wiki is full of?

PostPosted: 16 Jul 2014, 13:49
by Sorozone
This guy is claiming he knows everything because he's a "beta player" so when I showed him proof that banana magatamas exist and magatamas drop from dungeons, he tells me it's false because "JP DIDNT DO IT AND IT WASNT IN BETA". Is he really apart of the wiki or is he just full of himself and lying? I was honestly giving him the proof so he can add it to the wiki but he's too busy insulting me and upsetting me. Again, not a flame thread, wondering if he's really apart of the wiki and if they really don't know this mag drops now?

Images:
http://i1197.photobucket.com/albums/aa4 ... 12952e.jpg

http://i1197.photobucket.com/albums/aa4 ... fef33e.jpg

http://i1197.photobucket.com/albums/aa4 ... 0dc203.jpg

http://i1197.photobucket.com/albums/aa4 ... 3d9697.jpg

Re: Is this really what the wiki is full of?

PostPosted: 16 Jul 2014, 13:55
by Deathy
You sound so mad, I simply said never heard of it , and it wasn't in beta, and lot of us beta players been filling the wiki with Data.

and Maga aren't suppose to drop from mobs.

So you prove nothing , you rage over me simply saying never heard of it , and it wasn't there in beta? good job you look like an mad kid, who raging over an item, that we clearly don't have info on.

Good job at trying look cool. When in reality you are just raging kid who does nothing but talk down people rather then give info like an real Beta and Alpha tester does.


For example - Drops from xx mob/dungeon would help a lot, rather then just trash talk me ingame, and tell me grow up, when all I was doing trying help you.

2nd Don't post screenshot of my user name, blur it out it disrespectful and could be consider letting player flame at me.

3rd can a GM modify their post/edit their picture if they don't to remove my name from the picture and ect, cause I rather not have a flame and troll message me over this pitiful reason of not having data on something like so many other player, that filling out the wiki for people.

Re: Is this really what the wiki is full of?

PostPosted: 16 Jul 2014, 13:59
by Sorozone
Deathy wrote:You sound so mad, I simply said never heard of it , and it wasn't in beta, and lot of us beta players been filling the wiki with Data.

and Maga aren't suppose to drop from mobs.

So you prove nothing , you rage over me simply saying never heard of it , and it wasn't there in beta? good job you look like an mad kid, who raging over an item, that we clearly don't have info on.

Good job at trying look cool. When in reality you are just raging kid who does nothing but talk down people rather then give info like an real Beta and Alpha tester does.


For example - Drops from xx mob/dungeon would help a lot, rather then just trash talk me ingame, and tell me grow up, when all I was doing trying help you.

2nd Don't post screenshot of my user name, blur it out it disrespectful and could be consider letting player flame at me.

3rd can a GM modify their post/edit their picture if they don't to remove my name from the picture and ect, cause I rather not have a flame and troll message me over this pitiful reason of not having data on something like so many other player, that filling out the wiki for people.


But I have proof lol And isn't it trolling when people go "umad rage rage"? I fail to see how I'm trolling. You're just denying facts, this ISN'T BETA ANYMORE.

Re: Is this really what the wiki is full of?

PostPosted: 16 Jul 2014, 14:07
by Deathy
Sorozone wrote:
Deathy wrote:You sound so mad, I simply said never heard of it , and it wasn't in beta, and lot of us beta players been filling the wiki with Data.

and Maga aren't suppose to drop from mobs.

So you prove nothing , you rage over me simply saying never heard of it , and it wasn't there in beta? good job you look like an mad kid, who raging over an item, that we clearly don't have info on.

Good job at trying look cool. When in reality you are just raging kid who does nothing but talk down people rather then give info like an real Beta and Alpha tester does.


For example - Drops from xx mob/dungeon would help a lot, rather then just trash talk me ingame, and tell me grow up, when all I was doing trying help you.

2nd Don't post screenshot of my user name, blur it out it disrespectful and could be consider letting player flame at me.

3rd can a GM modify their post/edit their picture if they don't to remove my name from the picture and ect, cause I rather not have a flame and troll message me over this pitiful reason of not having data on something like so many other player, that filling out the wiki for people.


But I have proof lol And isn't it trolling when people go "umad rage rage"? I fail to see how I'm trolling. You're just denying facts, this ISN'T BETA ANYMORE.

I am asking why are you mad over a game, and the fact you post a picture with my name in it without consent, and on top of that, you are clearly stating the main fact which why I don't have notes on it , and instead of helping it get data to the Wiki , you act like an raging child, over an game.

Heck the game has so many misspell and bad grammar and some people call items abit differently and you said Banana, and I ask if it was Bandai - maybe you call it banana cause it was shape one or whatever reason, and the Bandai offer the same bow affect of 40% , just like that item, so why are you acting like an Rage kid , when I clearly said I don't have data on it, and neither does the wiki I went to double check if it was something I didn't get data on.

and the Fact you are using Caps to even talk, help prove my point even more, use bold to show something Important like this

Yes it not beta, and that why we hear something new , we get detail in it, rather then rage like you do.

Re: Is this really what the wiki is full of?

PostPosted: 16 Jul 2014, 14:08
by Rebecca
Deathy wrote:and Maga aren't suppose to drop from mobs.



emm.... what??????

Re: Is this really what the wiki is full of?

PostPosted: 16 Jul 2014, 14:09
by Deathy
Rebecca wrote:
Deathy wrote:and Maga aren't suppose to drop from mobs.



emm.... what??????


Magatama didn't drop during Beta and was only able to get from quest , or recipe - getting it as a drop was unheard of in the Beta.

Re: Is this really what the wiki is full of?

PostPosted: 16 Jul 2014, 14:09
by Sorozone
Deathy wrote:
Sorozone wrote:
Deathy wrote:You sound so mad, I simply said never heard of it , and it wasn't in beta, and lot of us beta players been filling the wiki with Data.

and Maga aren't suppose to drop from mobs.

So you prove nothing , you rage over me simply saying never heard of it , and it wasn't there in beta? good job you look like an mad kid, who raging over an item, that we clearly don't have info on.

Good job at trying look cool. When in reality you are just raging kid who does nothing but talk down people rather then give info like an real Beta and Alpha tester does.


For example - Drops from xx mob/dungeon would help a lot, rather then just trash talk me ingame, and tell me grow up, when all I was doing trying help you.

2nd Don't post screenshot of my user name, blur it out it disrespectful and could be consider letting player flame at me.

3rd can a GM modify their post/edit their picture if they don't to remove my name from the picture and ect, cause I rather not have a flame and troll message me over this pitiful reason of not having data on something like so many other player, that filling out the wiki for people.


But I have proof lol And isn't it trolling when people go "umad rage rage"? I fail to see how I'm trolling. You're just denying facts, this ISN'T BETA ANYMORE.

I am asking why are you mad over a game, and the fact you post a picture with my name in it without consent, and on top of that, you are clearly stating the main fact which why I don't have notes on it , and instead of helping it get data to the Wiki , you act like an raging child, over an game.

Heck the game has so many misspell and bad grammar and some people call items abit differently and you said Banana, and I ask if it was Bandai - maybe you call it banana cause it was shape one or whatever reason, and the Bandai offer the same bow affect of 40% , just like that item, so why are you acting like an Rage kid , when I clearly said I don't have data on it, and neither does the wiki I went to double check if it was something I didn't get data on.

and the Fact you are using Caps to even talk, help prove my point even more, use bold to show something Important like this

Yes it not beta, and that why we hear something new , we get detail in it, rather then rage like you do.


>me raging
>I gave you screenshots with details
>you call me fake and say I rage

You're a riot ._.

Re: Is this really what the wiki is full of?

PostPosted: 16 Jul 2014, 14:12
by OPPAI
Deathy wrote:
Rebecca wrote:
Deathy wrote:and Maga aren't suppose to drop from mobs.



emm.... what??????


Magatama didn't drop during Beta and was only able to get from quest , or recipe - getting it as a drop was unheard of in the Beta.

i guess beta matters more then

Re: Is this really what the wiki is full of?

PostPosted: 16 Jul 2014, 14:13
by Suwako
Both of you please, cease this childish behaviour.
Sheenah, is indeed posting proof that they exist, but does though post a picture of *cancer* and not banana.
i don't think you can hack, or would be able to, but i will say that you may be correct on those matters, that they yes exist, and yes they do drop from somewhere, as i myself obtained a mango magatama, from the forest.

now to the behaviour of Deathy.
yes you have been hit by an blacklisting, it should had been taken to the private with an moderator.
but the way you commented back was not only childish, but also rather unproffesional.
as you say, you are an alpha/beta tester, that do your best to find and give information out.

if the case is true, that you act like that to people giving you information, regardless of the fact they are proven, maybe not 100 % legitimate , but sure fire may be first section proofs, an Alpha /beta tester would had taken the info into consideration, and NOT telling people they lied, nor they are wrong.

deathy, i am not sure, how old you are, but i think the best thing for you to do now, is to apologise, not only to Sheena, but the community for your behaviour against people.
if you cannot full fill these requirements, it would be most likely, that you ave to step back from doing wikia stuff, until you have learned how to do prober wikia stuff.

i am so sorry you got blacklisted, sheenah it was dirty, but you are still correct.
sheenah, you too should apologise, and please do contact an moderator about these matters.

Re: Is this really what the wiki is full of?

PostPosted: 16 Jul 2014, 14:13
by Jung
ITT: We have an argument that needs to stay in Private Messages, and we learn the Wiki is outdated.