Ranking(?)

[cosmiCBreaker]

I think we need some kind of ranking here. Popularity or something.

[Penii]

If it's popularity then the rift members will be on top.

[Ryxa]

What's the point in ranking anything? :l

[SupremeTentacle]

It's impossible to come up with any sort of decent ranking.

Exp rates are too high to rank by exp (not to mention the super low level cap).

Flat damage is unfair, axes will always win.

DPS is unfair, wands will always win.

Clear speed is unfair, bows will always win.

Popularity is a stupid way to rank people.

If you really desperately want CS to rank people, it'd probably end up being by OC spent.

[HelixDraxzonyx]

I suppose if we had PvP we could rank people that way. The more players you kill and the stronger they are, the higher your rank. Or something like that. But I don't see PvP coming in anytime before the year 3000.

[cosmiCBreaker]

What's the point in ranking anything? :l

The point is, to add something on the game to make it more interesting.

[Dark Deceiver]

Popularity or something.

Seriously?

[HelixDraxzonyx]

Well we can't do popularity, otherwise all the "loli's" will dress in bra and panties with nekomimi, and get voted in by lolicons. That's not really something you want ranked, unless you like advertising that you roleplay as a monumental whore.

[cosmiCBreaker]

Popularity or something.

Seriously?

Yes, a popularity ranking like- who does the players think the strongest on players with level 110-115.

[cosmiCBreaker]

Flat damage is unfair, axes will always win.

Then making a division for each type of weapon would be good.